The case involves the education of Shannon Carter, who is now in her early 20’s. “The act itself simply imposes no requirement that the private school be approved by the state in parent-placement reimbursement cases,’' the Fourth Circuit panel said. requires only that a private school meet state educational standards when a school district or the state places a special-education student there. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled unanimously in 1991 that the I.D.E.A. Parents Awarded $36,000Ī three-judge panel of the U.S. The question in the South Carolina case is whether such reimbursement is required when the parents choose an institution that is not approved by the state to meet the standards demanded by the I.D.E.A. Massachusetts, the High Court held that parents of children with disabilities who believe the education offered by the public schools is inappropriate may “unilaterally’’ place the children in a private institution and be reimbursed if the courts later determine that the district failed to comply with the federal law. In a 1985 ruling, in Burlington School Committee v. The case involves the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, which sets forth the procedures districts must follow to guarantee a “free, appropriate public education’’ for all children with disabilities. 91-1523) are an example of “courts giving parents a veto power over the placement of their child,’' said a friend-of-the-court brief filed by the National School Boards Association, which urged the High Court to review the case. The lower-court rulings in Florence County School District v.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |